Zadowolony pisze:
... There is no "other side". It's a perceptual illusion. There is wholeness and the implicate order (Bohm, 1985). Our phylosophical view depends on what position we take. I take no positions, and if your ego thinks for a moment that you can pin me down, think again. There is no "definition" of spirituality in academic circles. There is an open round table debate with civility. What wiki describes is nothing I can relate to. The journey of enrichment called life is yours and mine respectively. I feel no need to justify anything. If anyone is interested in the content of my posts, that person can read what I post. I anyone is not, so be it. I do not respond to people who direct the unfolding of their low intent (Bohm, 1985) at me. I still find ways to add value in the midst of their low intent that manifest in their physiology, not mine.
There is the other side. One, what I previously called the crappy side (with fortune tellers, faith healers, spiritual gurus etc.), and the other, which I would call, the science side... Despite subjectivity embedded in us, and affects the way we perceive everything around... Science, and only science, provides us with the best method (as of now) to know... If there is no "other side" then why do you think Chopra is constantly arguing, in debates, with the best minds of science... If you take no sides, who do you think is right in those debates...if you have to chose one...?
A to dla Ciebie Tymoteusz (pierwszy i ostatni raz... ja lubie sprawiac by ludzie byli szczesliwi...jednakze wole, na ogol, uszczesliwiac plec inna niz moja wlasna...)
Jest druga strona. Jedna, ktora poprzednio nazywalem gowniana (z wrozkami, uzdrawiaczami przez wiare, spirytualnymi liderami itp.), i druga, ktora bym nazwal strona nauki... Pomimo ze subjektywnosc jest w nas, i ma ona wplyw na to jak postrzegamy wszystko dookola...Nauka, i tylko nauka, daje nam najlepsza metode (w obecnej chwili) na poznanie... Jezeli nie ma "drugiej strony" to jak myslisz, dlaczego Chopra ciagle sie wykluca w debatach z najlepszymi umyslami nauki... Jezeli nie jestes po jednej ze stron, to jak myslisz, kto ma racje w tych debatach...jezeli mosisz ktoras wybrac....?
A tak na marginesie... Zadowolony, jak sie juz podpierasz jakimis autorytetami (Bohm)...To moz nie wybieraj krypto -komunistow, bo zyjemy w ameryce i, chyba troszke nie wypada... a.. w tamtym czasie nie wypadalo nawet bardziej....

Nie, nie, oczywiscie podziwiam go jako czlowieka nauki...